This is an excerpt of the khutbah given by sheikh ali abdur-rahman al-hudhaifi , imam of masjid - e – nabawi , medina al-munawarah on the 13th of march 1998 .
It was given in response to a report by one of the security staff at masjid-e-nabawi tht he had seen ayatollah rafsanjani , the former president of iran , spitting on the grave of abu bakr !!! who is buried next to the prophet muhammad in medina .
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
How can there be any compromise between ahle sunnah and the shia ?
Ahle sunnah are those who uphold the Quran and hadith , it is through them Allah has protected the religion , they are those who are engaged in jihad for the glory and dignty of islam and established the glorious history of islam .
On the other hand are the rafida , they are those who curse an insult the companions (R) , they are those who are denigrating and demolishng islam .
It was the sahaba-e-keram (R) who were the ones who passed the religion down to us , so the people who curse and insult them are in reality - destroying islam .
So how can there be any compromise between ahle sunnah and the rawaafid whilst they curse and denigrate the three khulafa - abu bakr , umar and uthman (R) ?
If they had any sense they would know that they are actually cursing the prophet (S) himself !
Hazrat abu bakr and hazrat umar (R) were both father-in-laws of the prophet (S) they were the right hand men of the prophet (S) and after his demise , it was they who had great worry and feeling for the welfare of the religion .
Who else has ever been honoured with such a position and honour as was granted these two men ?
These two men participated in every battle with the prophet (S) , these facts are enough to refute shia beliefs .
As for hazrat uthman (R) he was husband to two of the prophets daughters !!! It is clear that Allah (S) does not choose for his messenger a son-in-law or companions except the best .
If the rawaafid are true in their claims , then could they explain why rasoolulah did not forewarn the ummah and clarify the alleged enmity of the khulafa-e-thalafa towards islam ?
Their insults and curses are not limited to the khulafa-e-thalafa , but also to hazrat ali (R) .
Because ali (R) himself gave an oath of allegiance to abu bakr (R) and also gave his daughter to hazrat umar (R) .
He also gave an oath of allegiance to uthman (R) .
Not only this , he was also the right hand man and well-wisher of the khulafa-e-thalafa .
So how could ali (R) have chosen a kaafir as a son-in-law for himself ?
And could hazrat ali (R) have given an oath of allegiance to a kaafir ?
Subhanullah , this is a great accusation !
Also by cursing hazrat muawiya (R) the rawaafid are also cursing hazrat hassan (R) , because hassan (R) gave the khalifaat to muawiya (R) for the pleasure of Allah .
Rasululah also foretold of this in a hadith , so can the grandson of the rasool (S) leave the khalifaat in the hands of a kaafir to rule over the people ?
Subhanullah , this is indeed a great accusation and insult !
If the rafida say that hazrat ali (R) and hazrat hassan (R) were forced into doing this , then this is proof that these rawaafid have no sense whatsover !
The accusations levelled at these two honoured companions of the prophet (S) are the worst insults imaginable and are beyond belief .
Furthermore , how can these rawaafid insult the mother of the believers - ayesha (R) when Allah (S) himself mentioned her in the Quran as the mother of the believers ?
Allah (S) said “The prophet is closer to the believers than their own selves , and his wives are their mothers” (Surah al-ahzab verse 6)
There is no doubt that only a person who will curse and insult the mother of the believers is one who does not consider her to be a mother , because for the one who does have a mother , does not curse her or insult her but loves her .
How can there be any compromise between ahle sunnah and the rawaafid when the rawaafid regard the leader of misguidance - khomeini as sinless and one protected from committing sins ?
They admit this because they consider him to be the deputy of THEIR OWN mehdi , the mehdi (Naked-cave-boy) they believe is hiding in a cave called “samurah” .
And because khomeini is the deputy of their mehdi and the order of the deputy is essentially the order of the deputor , their inference is that because the awaited mehdi is sinless then khomeini is also sinless , being mehdi’s deputy .
The rawaafid don’t stop there but maintain that all their scholars are sinless and all these scholars hold the status of being close to Allah .
As can be seen , this is a contradiction of their own beliefs , in this way they have destroyed the basis of their own religion .
This is not surprising , because facts based on falsehood and lies always clash and contradict each other , and a religion based on lies brings about it’s own destruction .
None of the ahle bayt subscribed to the false beliefs of the rawaafid , there are numerous , solid arguments based on logic and shareeah refuting their religion and their false beliefs , there are so many it would be impossible to count .
Therefore they should repent from their false beliefs and enter the fold of islam .
Therefore , we , ahle sunnah cannot be close to them even to the extent of a hair !
These people are more dangerous than the jews or christians !
They should never be trusted in any way whatsoever !
In fact muslims should always be in a state of vigilance against their evil plots and deceptions !
Allah (S) said “They are your enemy so beware of them , may Allah curse them , how they have deviated from the right path” (Surah munafiqeen verse 4)
The rawaafid actually descend from abu luhlu al-majoosi and abdullah ibn saba al-yahoodi !
